From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-h C-i Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:51:34 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <877jxty4gg.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87vflafi4g.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <873c6sogur.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87wu26xjey.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087595551 24688 80.91.224.253 (18 Jun 2004 21:52:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 23:52:25 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BbRHd-00069M-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:52:25 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BbRHd-0007YP-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:52:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BbRIk-0001R0-5a for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BbRIW-0001NI-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BbRIW-0001Mz-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BbRIW-0001MN-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BbRGq-00081K-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BbRGo-0001Ad-QA; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:51:34 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87wu26xjey.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:33:59 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25093 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25093 Any objections to adding a new keybinding `C-h C-i' to `info'? Control chars after C-h are used for commands that display specific files. I would rather maintain that pattern. How many times per day do you think you would use C-h C-i if we made that binding?