From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracking (was: new *Help* argument highlighting) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:50:59 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040512103042.FB57.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> <20040611122633.5F88.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087005163 29403 80.91.224.253 (12 Jun 2004 01:52:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 01:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 12 03:52:39 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYxhH-0001aJ-00 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 03:52:39 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYxhG-0006bw-00 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 03:52:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYxi2-0004Fa-Gq for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYxgg-0003Q9-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYxgb-0003Nw-NP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:51:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYxgb-0003Nt-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BYxff-0001sW-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BYxff-0007QJ-2d; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 21:50:59 -0400 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-reply-to: <20040611122633.5F88.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> (message from Juanma Barranquero on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:53:47 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24854 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24854 Still, the question remains: should we use some kind of issue tracker? It would be useful to keep track of the problems that need to be solved before we can make a release. However, using some special "issue tracker" seems like doing it the hard way. All we need is a file we can edit. We can keep it in /etc using CVS and edit it with Emacs. The main job is collecting the information to put in the file.