From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next-error refactoring Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:00 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040503.071327.124836670.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <20040504.075437.207586641.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <87llk552oz.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87isf6e7ji.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87iseg4x5d.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4npt8oeet9.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <4nd64j6u3p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4n3c5c64mx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nhdtnqrek.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aczcqyb1.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086908511 22708 80.91.224.253 (10 Jun 2004 23:01:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 11 01:01:38 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYYYD-0000yZ-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:01:37 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYYYD-0002V9-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:01:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYYYv-0003Mt-Id for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:02:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYYYR-0003Ak-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYYYP-0003AF-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYYYP-0003AC-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BYYXd-0003yo-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BYYXc-0005w9-J7; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 19:01:00 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87aczcqyb1.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:19:29 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24807 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24807 This can be applied to functions when their locations are listed in another buffer by commands that operate on function names, for example, `list-tags' (which is not "next-error" capable now), That is a good idea. However, I don't see a need to change frameworks based on that. `list-imenu', `list-outlines' (there are no such functions yet, but they would be useful). I am not sure that a list-imenu command would make sense. But we can add connections to next-error in other places where that does make sense.