From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Compiling byte code to native
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:13 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BVeeb-0008Ul-MX@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87u0xuuqvm.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086217039 12898 80.91.224.253 (2 Jun 2004 22:57:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:57:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 03 00:57:14 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BVefa-0002I3-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:57:14 +0200
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BVefa-0004lt-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:57:14 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BVeft-0002CY-9P
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:57:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BVefB-0001sM-OH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:50 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BVefA-0001rS-4Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVef9-0001rP-WE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BVeec-0007IF-8n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:14 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BVeeb-0008Ul-MX; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:13 -0400
Original-To: Matthew Mundell <matt@mundell.ukfsn.org>
In-reply-to: <87u0xuuqvm.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> (message from Matthew
	Mundell on 02 Jun 2004 12:43:41 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24435
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24435

I simply deleted that TODO entry, since it looks like this optimization
isn't worth a big effort.  Computers are so fast nowadays that Emacs
Lisp code hardly needs speeding up.

I only regret that you had to spend time on an optimization that turns
out not to be fruitful.  Thank you for working on it.