From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: minibuffer-eldef Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:55:56 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040529213132.GA31322@fencepost> <873c5hd35q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8765aadbgb.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <20040602071529.GA21505@fencepost> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086217008 12834 80.91.224.253 (2 Jun 2004 22:56:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wl@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, dak@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 03 00:56:42 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVef4-0002GA-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:56:42 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVef4-0004lo-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:56:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVefN-0001t5-1o for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVefC-0001se-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVefB-0001rq-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVefA-0001rP-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BVeeL-0007FQ-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BVeeK-0008Rl-MV; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:55:56 -0400 Original-To: Miles Bader In-reply-to: <20040602071529.GA21505@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:15:29 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24433 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24433 Let's end the discussion of whether to use (Default ) or [...] to indicate Emacs defaults. I am not going to change it now. We have lots of other work that needs doing in order to have a release, including updating the manuals. Could people work on that, please? I have noticed a tendency lately for people to write lots of mail discussing the precise best way to answer some minor question. It must be hard to get other work done while having these discussions.