From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 15:41:47 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <871xluig40.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87d64sgsw9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085946407 27413 80.91.224.253 (30 May 2004 19:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun May 30 21:46:43 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUWGY-0004ES-00 for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 21:46:42 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUWGY-0002ck-00 for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 21:46:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWGh-0004C4-Nm for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 15:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWCF-0001Xn-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 15:42:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWCD-0001Wx-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 15:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUWCD-0001Wb-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 15:42:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BUWBn-0004CI-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 15:41:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BUWBn-0007D9-0k; Sun, 30 May 2004 15:41:47 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24236 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24236 > I'd rather avoid defining M-N and M-P as different from M-n and M-p. > We don't need to do it; M-{ and M-} are equally easy to type. Not on a danish keyboard ... Sorry, I don't want to design key bindings for the sake of the danish keyboard.