From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 21:44:27 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <871xluig40.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87d64sgsw9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085810698 2988 80.91.224.253 (29 May 2004 06:04:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 06:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 08:04:54 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTwxi-0001Lg-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 08:04:54 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTwxi-0004hh-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 08:04:54 +0200 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mailman.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BTwxm-0001Wv-Gw for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 02:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BTwxE-0001Ig-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 02:04:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BTwx9-0001He-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 02:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BTwx8-0001Ha-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 02:04:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BTwvz-0001Ks-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 02:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BTstf-0004im-60; Fri, 28 May 2004 21:44:27 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87d64sgsw9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 25 May 2004 23:22:11 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24144 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24144 goto-error: C-m, C-c C-c, M-o Why do we want to define M-o as well as the other two? That doesn't follow any general convention, it isn't more convenient than C-m, and it isn't needed for compatibility. next-error-no-visit: M-n Let's call that forward-error-message. previous-error-no-visit: M-p Let's call that backward-error-message. next-error-file-no-select: M-}, M-N I'd rather avoid defining M-N and M-P as different from M-n and M-p. We don't need to do it; M-{ and M-} are equally easy to type. Also, let's call these commands forward-error-source-file and backward-error-source-file. next-error-file: new global command without keybindings previous-error-file: new global command without keybindings What would these new commands do?