From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 19:53:33 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <871xluig40.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87u0y6jjq9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87n03wgt76.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4nd64rl2ah.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085723763 17282 80.91.224.253 (28 May 2004 05:56:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 05:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri May 28 07:55:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTaLU-0005aW-00 for ; Fri, 28 May 2004 07:55:56 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTaLU-000664-00 for ; Fri, 28 May 2004 07:55:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BTZsz-00053s-F3 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 01:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BTVNA-0001n5-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 20:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BTVCe-0008L1-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 20:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BTUgo-0002fu-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 19:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BTUgn-00027e-Nj; Thu, 27 May 2004 19:53:33 -0400 Original-To: Ted Zlatanov In-reply-to: <4nd64rl2ah.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Wed, 26 May 2004 09:56:54 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24058 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24058 Maybe if there's more than one next-error capable buffers that are linked together (e.g. occur on a diff) then C-u next-error should advance through the "underlying" next-error buffer (the diff) while next-error should advance through the "overlay" next-error buffer (the occur). That is a bad solution because it requires people to remember yet another feature. The other solution is better, because it is more likely that the intended thing will happen as a result of use of the other existing features.