From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: erase-buffer (was: with-output-to-temp-buffer) Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:42:01 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200405020157.KAA07108@etlken.m17n.org> <200405060505.OAA21188@etlken.m17n.org> <200405061310.WAA22378@etlken.m17n.org> <200405101213.VAA04125@etlken.m17n.org> <87ekpsuzqa.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <877jvjnl4g.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200405112306.IAA09060@etlken.m17n.org> <20040511232651.GB5298@fencepost> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084391700 8198 80.91.224.253 (12 May 2004 19:55:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 19:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed May 12 21:54:42 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNzoQ-00005g-00 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:54:42 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BNzoP-00069c-01 for ; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:54:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BNzhR-00071m-L6 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BNzgy-00070z-Ro for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BNzgS-0006xP-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:46:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BNzc9-0006bw-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BNzc9-0007ps-3B; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:42:01 -0400 Original-To: Miles Bader In-reply-to: <20040511232651.GB5298@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on Tue, 11 May 2004 19:26:51 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23272 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23272 I think for user-use, it might make more sense to define some other command that acts more normally (i.e., obeys buffer narrowing, etc.). Perhaps call it `delete-whole-buffer' (analogous to `mark-whole-buffer'). That would be several more characters to type, given the existing completion alternatives, and I see no need for the change.