From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Possible problem with Gnus
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:40:51 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BNzb1-0007hc-03@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20040509230720.GB20485@fencepost> <x5wu3kn0nl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<v93c688up1.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
	<E1BNWHg-000844-Cs@fencepost.gnu.org> <x5y8nzuogm.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084391693 8185 80.91.224.253 (12 May 2004 19:54:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 19:54:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: reiner.steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed May 12 21:54:40 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNzoO-00005B-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:54:40 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNzoN-00069c-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 12 May 2004 21:54:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNzl9-0008Ci-IY
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:51:19 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNzjH-0007i4-8R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:49:23 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNzij-0007YG-VR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:49:21 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BNzb1-0006KE-RE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:40:52 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNzb1-0007hc-03; Wed, 12 May 2004 15:40:51 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x5y8nzuogm.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on 11
	May 2004 14:40:09 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23269
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23269

    No, and you have to explicitly ask for display/extraction of each
    attachment separately.  The only exception AFAICS are inline image
    attachments not exceeding a specific size, and text mode stuff like
    rich text.

That is good.  I'm reassured that people have been paying attention
to this already.