From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: gdbui hang
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 08:23:00 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BNWHk-00084X-9u@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <buosme899jk.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<16543.48205.566122.924505@nick.uklinux.net>
	<87ekpsrvvh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<16543.52509.961888.971742@nick.uklinux.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084278577 30627 80.91.224.253 (11 May 2004 12:29:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 12:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nick@nick.uklinux.net, miles@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue May 11 14:29:30 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNWO1-0000P1-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Tue, 11 May 2004 14:29:29 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BNWO1-0003H9-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 11 May 2004 14:29:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNWLt-0001gV-8S
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 08:27:17 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNWIL-00015w-Kd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 08:23:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNWHl-0000y5-ET
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 08:23:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BNWHk-0000xh-Om
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2004 08:23:01 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BNWHk-00084X-9u; Tue, 11 May 2004 08:23:00 -0400
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nick@nick.uklinux.net>
In-reply-to: <16543.52509.961888.971742@nick.uklinux.net> (message from Nick
	Roberts on Mon, 10 May 2004 19:42:37 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23133
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23133

    If GDB developers add new and undocumented annotations then it makes matters
    difficult. I will ask them not to do this and perheps this new annotation
    could be backed out in an imminent respin of GDB (6.1.1).

    I'm sure GDB developers would say "switch to GDB/MI", but I'm not finding this
    as easy as it sounds.

Please write to them, and cc the message to me, so I can second
the request.