From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: compilation-highlight-duration Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:48:06 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040503.071327.124836670.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <20040504.075437.207586641.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> <87llk552oz.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87isf6e7ji.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084128706 18877 80.91.224.253 (9 May 2004 18:51:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 18:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, no-spam@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun May 09 20:51:40 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BMtOm-00062l-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2004 20:51:40 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BMtOm-0001hE-00 for ; Sun, 09 May 2004 20:51:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BMtOH-0008De-Mw for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 14:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BMtND-00080K-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 14:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BMtLQ-0006mL-Hp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 14:48:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BMtLK-0006bg-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2004 14:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.33) id 1BMtLK-00020m-5M; Sun, 09 May 2004 14:48:06 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87isf6e7ji.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 09 May 2004 04:03:14 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22983 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22983 However, creating two similar user options and binding one of them in `next-error-no-select' will allow the user to specify preferred highlighting methods separately for selected and non-selected error visiting. Does anyone actually want the highlighting after using next-error? If we don't need that feature, I'd say just move the highlighting code into next-error-no-select.