From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, no-spam@cua.dk
Subject: Re: compilation-highlight-duration
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:48:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BMtLK-00020m-5M@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87isf6e7ji.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 09 May 2004 04:03:14 +0300)
However, creating two similar user options and binding one of them in
`next-error-no-select' will allow the user to specify preferred
highlighting methods separately for selected and non-selected
error visiting.
Does anyone actually want the highlighting after using next-error?
If we don't need that feature, I'd say just move the highlighting
code into next-error-no-select.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-09 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-01 5:29 compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-01 17:51 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-02 16:47 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-03 14:03 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-03 14:13 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 7:43 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-04 14:54 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 16:55 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-04 17:20 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-04 20:01 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-04 21:30 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-04 20:32 ` compilation-highlight-duration Drew Adams
2004-05-04 19:15 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-04 21:35 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 17:33 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Monnier
2004-05-05 18:05 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 20:20 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-05 20:59 ` compilation-highlight-duration Tak Ota
2004-05-05 22:47 ` compilation-highlight-duration Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-05-05 21:22 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Monnier
2004-05-06 5:58 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-06 9:23 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-06 7:48 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-06 10:34 ` compilation-highlight-duration David Kastrup
2004-05-06 10:22 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-07 0:29 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-07 0:29 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
2004-05-09 1:03 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-09 18:48 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-05-09 19:12 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-10 7:17 ` compilation-highlight-duration Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-10 20:30 ` compilation-highlight-duration Stefan Daschek
2004-05-28 11:19 ` compilation-highlight-duration Juri Linkov
2004-05-28 11:42 ` compilation-highlight-duration Kim F. Storm
2004-05-28 15:45 ` next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration) Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-28 18:14 ` next-error refactoring Juri Linkov
2004-05-29 3:54 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-05-29 17:03 ` next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration) Richard Stallman
2004-06-01 17:55 ` next-error refactoring Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-02 17:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:23 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-07 21:27 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-09 19:52 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-02 17:36 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-03 15:30 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-03 23:33 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-07 16:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-04 2:03 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-07 16:11 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-07 17:01 ` Tak Ota
2004-06-08 20:31 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-11 18:39 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-12 9:44 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-30 18:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-07-01 5:47 ` Juri Linkov
2004-09-13 18:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-09-14 10:28 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-09-15 18:08 ` Ted Zlatanov
2004-06-09 9:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-06-09 20:19 ` Juri Linkov
2004-06-10 23:01 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-29 17:02 ` compilation-highlight-duration Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1BMtLK-00020m-5M@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=no-spam@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).