From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Patch for sql.el
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 17:59:54 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BMZrO-00015j-Un@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwv7jvpchc6.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<20040507152703.46444.qmail@web60306.mail.yahoo.com>
	<409BBDD3.40803@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084053904 6302 80.91.224.253 (8 May 2004 22:05:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 22:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun May 09 00:04:59 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BMZwJ-0004tE-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sun, 09 May 2004 00:04:59 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BMZwJ-0006Af-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 09 May 2004 00:04:59 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BMZup-0003Yl-GT
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 08 May 2004 18:03:27 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BMZt0-0002xD-Rr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2004 18:01:34 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BMZrf-00013K-Ei
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2004 18:00:45 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BMZrV-0000lX-4N
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2004 18:00:01 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BMZrO-00015j-Un; Sat, 08 May 2004 17:59:55 -0400
Original-To: Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com>
In-reply-to: <409BBDD3.40803@yahoo.com> (message from Kevin Rodgers on Fri, 07
	May 2004 10:48:19 -0600)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22943
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22943

    Why not define the vendor-specific modes as derived modes?  Would that
    simplify things?

Making them derived modes might be a good idea, if we need to have
them.  Please let's not call them "vendor"-specific.  The developers
of Postgres are not a vendor, any more than we are a vendor.