From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What happened to wdired.el? Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 10:03:23 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200404281829.i3SITeGK028426@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <200404290105.i3T15UGK014344@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <87llkenrol.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <20040430084333.GA29704@fencepost> <873c6irfe7.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083594542 20510 80.91.224.253 (3 May 2004 14:29:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 14:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 16:28:46 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKeR1-0005mN-00 for ; Mon, 03 May 2004 16:28:43 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BKeR1-0000ft-00 for ; Mon, 03 May 2004 16:28:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKePP-0002yA-I5 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 10:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKe9A-0004ej-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 10:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BKe44-00028w-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 10:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BKe2W-0001UL-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 10:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1BKe2V-0005Em-95; Mon, 03 May 2004 10:03:23 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <873c6irfe7.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 02 May 2004 18:57:04 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22624 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22624 The user can forget to call dired-execute later. But what about C-x C-q asking yes/no question about accepting the changes, and an option to disable such a question? What are the changes in question, and why would they be lost? Can we find a solution whereby they are not lost?