From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Improved help from minibuffer prompts
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:47:11 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1BFK87-0004jT-CX@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <w4dptacgzr0.fsf@nanni.riic.uni-linz.ac.at>
	<87y8oxh3hp.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082325344 11611 80.91.224.253 (18 Apr 2004 21:55:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:55:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Matthew Mundell <matt@mundell.ukfsn.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 18 23:55:40 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BFKGK-00066B-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:55:40 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BFKGK-0008UJ-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:55:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BFKFa-00019P-P8
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:54:54 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BFKBj-0007LE-4r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:50:55 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BFK9T-0006Ci-JZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:49:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BFK90-0005wA-TX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:48:06 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1BFK87-0004jT-CX; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:47:11 -0400
Original-to: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <87y8oxh3hp.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> (message from Matthew
	Mundell on 15 Apr 2004 12:42:10 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21856
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21856

Do people think the proposed `question' function is a good idea?