From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new compile command doesn't coalesce errors on the same line Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:24:30 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040317215208.5b0cb3e2.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040317224726.GC12561@fencepost> <20040320074137.2ea2c886.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040321092224.039cd09b.occitan@esperanto.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1079933583 19085 80.91.224.253 (22 Mar 2004 05:33:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 05:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 06:32:58 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B5I3W-0001qu-00 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:32:58 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B5I3V-0002AL-00 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:32:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B5I2p-0001nU-Rv for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:32:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B5I0C-0000co-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:29:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B5Hzb-0008Td-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B5Hza-0008SB-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:28:55 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1B5HvK-00076I-Vj; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:24:30 -0500 Original-To: Daniel Pfeiffer In-reply-to: <20040321092224.039cd09b.occitan@esperanto.org> (dapfy@t-online.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20701 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20701 *Compilation motion commands skip visited locations if this is t. A location is considered visited if you've already jumped there. It doesn't matter if this happened from a different message. After you start a new compilation, all locations will again be initially considered unvisited. The condition is clear now. I am not sure what "Compilation motion commands" are or what "skip" means. Could you explain? What will happen if I move up in the compilation buffer and type RET to revisit an error I already saw? Will it be "skipped"? What if I then type C-x `? Will it got to the following error, or will it move down until it finds an error I have not yet visited? The example I cited location a: ... location b location a: more bla about a is not contrived. I've seen this frequently at work. The old compile simply ignored location b. Now it is found and breaks immediate contiguousness. I see what you mean. I don't have an opinion about it. I won't say this is a bad change.