From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bytecomp and older Emacsen
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:57:08 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1Alus8-0008Iy-2y@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <rzqd695pb6u.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
	<jwvr7xlcijf.fsf-monnier+emacs/pretest@asado.iro.umontreal.ca>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075317094 26673 80.91.224.253 (28 Jan 2004 19:11:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 28 20:11:18 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Alv5q-000316-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:11:18 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Alv5p-0008Qk-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:11:18 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Aluu3-00014q-6n
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:59:07 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AlutJ-00014H-EI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:58:21 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Alusn-0000wT-LO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:58:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Alusn-0000wI-Cz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:57:49 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Alus8-0008Iy-2y; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:57:08 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvr7xlcijf.fsf-monnier+emacs/pretest@asado.iro.umontreal.ca>
	(message from Stefan Monnier on 27 Jan 2004 14:17:15 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19530
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19530

    Is it OK to get rid of the strange support for byte-compiling for older
    Emacsen in bytecomp.el ?

We can get rid of the Emacs 18 support, definitely.