From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:46:01 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1AklWT-0003Ef-RV@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <877jzn2lk8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<E1AjEYN-0001wf-Gx@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ilun08hnd7y.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<E1Ajk4L-0005Zz-CO@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<iluwu7j7qbv.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<16401.5059.249741.523854@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075042143 8188 80.91.224.253 (25 Jan 2004 14:49:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jas@extundo.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 25 15:48:59 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AklZL-0002EL-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:48:59 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AklZK-0002Wj-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:48:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AklXm-0002zW-Dr
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:47:22 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AklXQ-0002wN-Ao
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:47:00 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AklWk-0002kF-FF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:46:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AklWk-0002kA-3p
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:46:18 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AklWT-0003Ef-RV; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:46:01 -0500
Original-To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <16401.5059.249741.523854@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (message from
	Ian Jackson on Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:29:55 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19477
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19477

    IMO the correct way for a MUA to invoke sendmail (on Debian) is
      /usr/sbin/sendmail -odb -oee ...

Perhaps that means there should be a change in this code:

			      (if mail-interactive
				  ;; These mean "report errors to terminal"
				  ;; and "deliver interactively"
				  '("-oep" "-odi")

Perhaps mail-interactive would be a good default if those options
were different.  But I am not sure.