From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:00:45 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1Ajk4L-0005Zz-CO@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <877jzn2lk8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
	<E1AjEYN-0001wf-Gx@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ilun08hnd7y.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1074798449 11910 80.91.224.253 (22 Jan 2004 19:07:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:07:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 20:07:26 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AjkAo-0003ZG-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:07:26 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AjkAn-0000Px-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:07:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Ajk8G-0000VQ-Pf
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:04:48 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Ajk79-00006q-EY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:03:39 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Ajk6X-0008Kn-3X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:03:32 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ajk6W-0008KJ-Hh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:03:00 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Ajk4L-0005Zz-CO; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:00:45 -0500
Original-To: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
In-reply-to: <ilun08hnd7y.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (message from Simon
	Josefsson on Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:33:53 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19427
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19427

      But this may not work well if
    /usr/lib/sendmail hangs for hours,

Are all mailers liable to hang for hours, or is it only Sendmail that
does so?  For instance, we use Exim.  Can Exim hang for hours when you
invoke it in this way to send a message?