From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:17:50 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1AR1yw-0000UQ-2v@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87wua28zux.fsf@zip.com.au>
	<200311190418.hAJ4ITC02466@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<jwvd6bp6l0o.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<200311190528.hAJ5SrK02553@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<jwvsmkkxy5q.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<3FBBD155.2050703@yahoo.com>
	<jwvllqcukuo.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<200311192238.hAJMcTM06424@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<jwv8ymbtzl1.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<x5smkjkwsh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<jwvwu9v2jzg.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<x5ad6rks9a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <3FBD2533.6090503@yahoo.com>
	<rjptffuhm7.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk>
	<jwvsmkbm204.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
	<200311270014.hAR0E0i02821@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<rjekvu3vd5.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk>
	<200311271611.hARGBhP04028@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1AProa-000487-CH@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<rj1xrrs22u.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk>
	<E1AQd7O-0002KQ-Bb@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<rj65h0u79i.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070352452 5731 80.91.224.253 (2 Dec 2003 08:07:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:07:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 02 09:07:30 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AR5ZC-0001LW-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:07:30 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AR5Yw-00005w-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:07:29 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AR6Kj-0001lA-7B
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 03:56:37 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AR3m0-000279-32
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:12:36 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AR35q-0003QD-Cm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:29:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AR35n-0003PR-5J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:28:59 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AR1yw-0000UQ-2v; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:17:50 -0500
Original-To: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
In-reply-to: <rj65h0u79i.fsf@sheridan.dina.kvl.dk> (message from Per
	Abrahamsen on Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:06:33 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18260
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18260

    I'd say having one (or more) well chosen ":group"s is at the same
    level of importance as following the conventions for doc strings.

Any doc string that doesn't follow the conventions definitely should
be fixed.

So let's add a compiler warning for a defcustom that has nil for its group.