From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Replace starttls.el with GNUTLS based version? Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:19:15 -0500 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070335978 15902 80.91.224.253 (2 Dec 2003 03:32:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 03:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, ueno@unixuser.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3587@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 02 04:32:55 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AR1HT-0000U9-00 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 04:32:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AR1HC-0000ZJ-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 21:32:38 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AQwXM-0007PV-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:29:00 -0600 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2313A0025 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:28:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AQwNv-0003Ef-HP; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:19:15 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-reply-to: (message from Simon Josefsson on Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:31:49 +0100) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55047 gmane.emacs.devel:18254 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18254 So, does anyone have an opinion for or against moving gnus/contrib/starttls.el into gnus/lisp/starttls.el and emacs/lisp/gnus/starttls.el? Do we have legal papers for it?