From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:08:05 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87wua28zux.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ad6vdsxi.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <200311190418.hAJ4ITC02466@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311190528.hAJ5SrK02553@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <3FBBD155.2050703@yahoo.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069388319 29251 80.91.224.253 (21 Nov 2003 04:18:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 04:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ihs_4664@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 05:18:36 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AN2ke-0004d6-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AN2ke-0006Fd-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 05:18:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AN3hm-0002HQ-9k for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:19:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AN3gS-00029E-F3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:18:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AN3fv-0001Wb-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:18:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AN3fu-0001WO-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AN2aT-0006JU-JJ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:08:05 -0500 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on 19 Nov 2003 16:15:55 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18001 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18001 What is the benefit ? Why should something be only allowed via M-x customize-variable but not via M-x set-variable (and vice-versa, BTW) ? Maybe it would be ok to use customizability as the criterion for user-variable-p. However, I am not sure it would be an improvement over the current way of handling things.