From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: go to bottom of mail message Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:17 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200311191126.hAJBQY6C008722@beta.mvs.co.il> <200311191155.UAA15601@etlken.m17n.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069302052 18662 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 04:20:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ehud@unix.mvs.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 20 05:20:49 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMgJF-0000dv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:20:49 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMgJF-0007iY-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:20:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhD1-0000UC-R1 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:18:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhC0-0000DT-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:17:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhAW-0008JJ-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:16:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhAV-0008IN-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AMg5B-0007Dx-Bd; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:17 -0500 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: <200311191155.UAA15601@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:55:07 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17940 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17940 (2) I've just noticed that rmail-summary-beginning-of-message works slightly differently than rmail-beginnig-of-message. The formar moves point to the really beginning of a message, but the latter moves point to the beginning of a BODY of a message. When I try it, rmail-beginnig-of-message puts point at the real beginning of the message. I think it is better not to change that.