From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc elisp intro cross reference fixes Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:11 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87wua28zux.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ad6vdsxi.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <200311190418.hAJ4ITC02466@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200311190528.hAJ5SrK02553@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069301887 18379 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 04:18:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 20 05:18:03 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMgGZ-0000Z6-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:18:03 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMgGZ-0007ew-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:18:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhBn-00008i-NH for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:17:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhBj-00008W-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:17:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhAU-0008Hz-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AMhAQ-0008GU-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:15:49 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AMg55-0007Dh-3p; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:06:11 -0500 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on 19 Nov 2003 08:56:47 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17938 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17938 Anyway my point is that the difference between defcustom with and without a * is in practice absent and in theory much too subtle and debatable to justify its existence (after all, who knows whether users will want to set something interactively or only at startup). Shouldn't set-variable distinguish, at least for completion purposes?