From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: (elisp)Numbers
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:26:02 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1ACFFi-0004k9-66@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200310210229.h9L2TGl12085@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<2719-Tue21Oct2003073855+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066815980 29280 80.91.224.253 (22 Oct 2003 09:46:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:46:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 22 11:46:14 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ACFZG-0002Xw-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:46:14 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ACFZG-000432-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:46:14 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ACFWr-0002MC-8C
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:43:45 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ACFKm-0003wD-VQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:31:16 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ACFK4-0003Kr-Hm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:31:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ACFJv-0003Ii-2D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:30:23 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1ACFFi-0004k9-66; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:26:02 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
In-reply-to: <2719-Tue21Oct2003073855+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17325
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17325

      (Btw, I
    expect the bahavior we see today to change over the next years, as C9x
    propagates with its new requirements about FP exceptions.)

I have never seen the C9X spec.  What are these changes
that are relevant to this?