From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undocumented hyperlinks in doc strings. Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:06:00 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200310090050.h990oIa15681@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310100327.h9A3REl20310@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310150138.h9F1cWg10456@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310152352.h9FNqTH18721@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066345984 16836 80.91.224.253 (16 Oct 2003 23:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 01:13:02 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAHIk-0001Dp-00 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:13:02 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAHIj-000792-00 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:13:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AAHGA-0001g2-HT for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AAHG3-0001fU-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AAHFW-0001a6-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AAHFW-0001Zq-8a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AAHBw-0002S7-TK; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:06:00 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200310152352.h9FNqTH18721@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:52:29 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17182 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17182 Is this commenting out instead of deletion done for historical record or because one was not sure about the change and because hence there is the possibility that one might want to sooner or later revert to the original code? Both sorts of things are done as normal practice.