From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undocumented hyperlinks in doc strings. Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:00:45 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200310090050.h990oIa15681@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310100327.h9A3REl20310@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200310150138.h9F1cWg10456@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066248557 29198 80.91.224.253 (15 Oct 2003 20:09:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 15 22:09:15 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A9rxL-00044i-00 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:09:15 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A9rxK-0002IW-00 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:09:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A9rwz-0004lJ-Cx for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:08:53 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A9rtX-0003Aq-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:05:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A9rt7-0002sl-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A9rsT-0002YB-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1A9rp7-0007qU-4B; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:00:45 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200310150138.h9F1cWg10456@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 14 Oct 2003 20:38:32 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17126 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17126 It is not unusual to comment out code that was replaced. Whether it is worth keeping depends on details. Maybe it would be just as well to delete that comment, but I would not say all such comments should always be deleted.