From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windows-1251 language environment Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:44:40 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200310032356.54476.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <200310060013.52049.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <200310070254.LAA11795@etlken.m17n.org> <200310081040.TAA15162@etlken.m17n.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065711326 17969 80.91.224.253 (9 Oct 2003 14:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pogonyshev@gmx.net, jasonr@f2s.com, d.love@dl.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 09 16:55:23 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7cCJ-0005sq-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:55:23 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7cCJ-0004bn-00 for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:55:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A7cAe-0008W5-RV for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:53:40 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A7c5C-0007JV-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1A7c4f-0007Cr-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A7c4d-0007C9-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1A7c1w-00079A-Bu; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:44:40 -0400 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: <200310081040.TAA15162@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:40:12 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17008 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17008 With inheritance, the change to parent affects lang. envs inheritting it. With copying, no. So, purhaps both method is useful (as well as the case of face). Is it useful enough to warrant spending time writing it and debugging it, and spend time and paper documenting it? We could do other things instead.