From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Let's tell we are using GTK+
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:10:25 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19qiSf-0008LR-Bo@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <yojfzkivkm4.fsf@igor.phys.ntnu.no>
	<sgdn0epbz52.fsf@occarina.pna.cwi.nl>
	<yoj1xw1qktw.fsf@igor.phys.ntnu.no>
	<sgd65ku3rpu.fsf@occarina.pna.cwi.nl>
	<20030820182418.GA10777@milla.autsens.localnet>
	<jeu18b8h63.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061684549 18098 80.91.224.253 (24 Aug 2003 00:22:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 24 02:22:27 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19qieJ-0001k8-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:22:27 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19qijA-0001uk-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:27:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19qidn-0005jZ-AW
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:21:55 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19qiXo-0003Ki-Pb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:15:44 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19qiWN-0002Be-IN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:14:46 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19qiVf-0001iE-R6; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:13:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19qiSf-0008LR-Bo; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 20:10:25 -0400
Original-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
In-reply-to: <jeu18b8h63.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on
	Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:59:48 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16115
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16115

    |> I believe, asprintf would be better, but I don't know about portability...

    It's a GNU extension, but a portable implementation is part of libiberty.

It would be ok to use this if we copy that code into Emacs,
but if it is easy to avoid, let's avoid it.