From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [vms] extending Lisp_Process
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:03 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19c5aV-0003rt-IY@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E19c0MW-00008L-00@colo.agora-net.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058199355 18062 80.91.224.249 (14 Jul 2003 16:15:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:15:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 18:15:52 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19c5zU-0004gr-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:15:52 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19c6Co-0007nz-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:29:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19c5xl-0000On-M0
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:14:05 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19c5tJ-0006kc-S5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:09:29 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19c5kK-0003Zq-5w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:00:12 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19c5aX-0000Jj-5s
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:05 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19c5aV-0003rt-IY; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:03 -0400
Original-To: ttn@glug.org
In-reply-to: <E19c0MW-00008L-00@colo.agora-net.com> (message from Thien-Thi
	Nguyen on Mon, 14 Jul 2003 06:15:16 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15598
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15598

    for vms subprocess support, i would like to integrate Richard
    Levitte's external VMS_PROC_STUFF structure into the Lisp_Process
    structure.  is that ok?  something like:

    struct Lisp_Process
      {
    #ifdef VMS
	struct VMS_PROC_STUFF *vms_proc_stuff;
	/* etc */
    #endif
	/* existing Lisp_Process members here */
      };

As long as it's in a VMS conditional, I have no objection.