From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: invisibility in info
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:12:12 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19S6tI-0007Xh-PR@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200306160237.h5G2biA08226@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1055819402 21129 80.91.224.249 (17 Jun 2003 03:10:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:10:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 17 05:09:56 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19S6r6-0005Tz-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:09:56 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19S7Eo-0003z5-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:34:26 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19S6tb-0002KV-Mr
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:12:31 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19S6tK-0002Is-KV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:12:14 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19S6tJ-0002Go-BP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:12:13 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19S6tJ-0002GC-05
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:12:13 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19S6tI-0007Xh-PR; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:12:12 -0400
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200306160237.h5G2biA08226@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc
	Teirlinck on Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:37:44 -0500 (CDT))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15144
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15144

    Essentially it handles all involved text, except the very last space
    by the invisibility property and gives the last space the same display
    properties Stefan gave to the entire stretch of whitespace.

    Is it OK if I commit this patch?

Ok.