From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Idea for compilation mode Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:07:48 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1054626136.3edc5158c76a4@webmail.isogmbh.de> <847k83flph.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <1054646065.3edc9f3185c49@webmail.isogmbh.de> <1054649313.3edcabe19bbb1@webmail.isogmbh.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054773112 8914 80.91.224.249 (5 Jun 2003 00:31:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 02:31:47 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Nien-0001Mr-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 02:31:05 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19Niwb-0001WZ-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 02:49:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Nic0-0003zy-No for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NiWQ-0002A2-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NiNz-0007yG-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19NiIH-0005eM-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20) id 19NiIG-0003hh-Pq; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 20:07:48 -0400 Original-To: Stephan Stahl In-reply-to: <1054649313.3edcabe19bbb1@webmail.isogmbh.de> (message from Stephan Stahl on Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:08:33 +0200) Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14728 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14728 I think that is a good idea. What do you think about extending the compile thing to treat errors and warnings different? I know that depends just on compilation-error-regexp-alist but when someone is already adding some keys maybe it would be worth to add the same for warnings to. That way one can look quickly for error in the compilation and when neccessary for warnings to get the code clean. It sounds like a good feature. I would suggest having a variable that controls whether warnings are ignored.