From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Different (buffer-file-)coding-systems for different regions of
 one buffer? (for Rmail MIME)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 08:44:53 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19Kdoz-0006z7-EK@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <i56wugl13qq.fsf@mao.acc.umu.se> <i563cj8kz7e.fsf@mao.acc.umu.se>
	<200305211953.h4LJr9Iq000699@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<i56smr8j8lk.fsf@mao.acc.umu.se>
	<200305212229.h4LMTFKo001277@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<i56u1bnn567.fsf@mao.acc.umu.se>
	<878yszvean.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	<E19JBH6-0006HV-2D@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87wughogc8.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	<87brxql1vt.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054039589 6971 80.91.224.249 (27 May 2003 12:46:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue May 27 14:46:26 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19KdqU-0001o8-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Tue, 27 May 2003 14:46:26 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19Ke4B-0000Yh-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 27 May 2003 15:00:35 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19KdrC-0000Mo-Om
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:47:10 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19Kdqi-00009s-Lk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:46:40 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19KdqC-0008MF-Sv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:46:09 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19Kdp0-0007vh-B4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:44:54 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19Kdoz-0006z7-EK; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:44:53 -0400
Original-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
In-reply-to: <87brxql1vt.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org)
Original-cc: stktrc@yahoo.com
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14312
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14312

    That's assuming that it is text.  This implementation would make
    corruption of attached binaries likely and signed messages somewhat
    likely

I don't think so.  Why would you edit a binary attachment?

    But you don't have the original text any more (except in the disk
    file).

I have the impression we are not talking about the same thing.