From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: mode line depth
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 18:48:06 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19JLKY-0002oh-VJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200305221527.h4MFR0ne004907@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053730992 19223 80.91.224.249 (23 May 2003 23:03:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 23:03:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 24 01:03:10 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19JLX7-0004qc-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 24 May 2003 01:01:05 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19JLj5-00086C-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 24 May 2003 01:13:27 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JLX0-0001IS-3G
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 19:00:58 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JLUB-0000At-90
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 18:58:03 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JLL2-0003wY-8r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 18:48:38 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JLKZ-0003m5-7W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 18:48:07 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JLKY-0002oh-VJ; Fri, 23 May 2003 18:48:06 -0400
Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
In-reply-to: <200305221527.h4MFR0ne004907@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14169
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14169

    Should we bump up the current limit of 10 to something like 20 (or
    even 100, just to be "safe") ?
    BTW, the mode line just says "*invalid*", I suggest that it
    should say "*toodeep*" instead, it would have saved me some time.

They both seem like good ideas to me.