From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Zap-to-char behaviour
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 08:04:14 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19JBHS-0006KW-9R@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20030521163038.2792062E4D@mallaury.noc.nerim.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1053692325 12172 80.91.224.249 (23 May 2003 12:18:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 12:18:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 14:18:40 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19JBV5-000386-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 14:18:19 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19JBgp-0001ct-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 23 May 2003 14:30:27 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JBRz-0005mk-6E
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 08:15:07 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JBJ8-0002qF-LB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 08:05:58 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JBI5-0002NQ-Ua
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 08:04:55 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JBHS-0001ox-FQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 08:04:14 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19JBHS-0006KW-9R; Fri, 23 May 2003 08:04:14 -0400
Original-To: <jmarant@nerim.net>
In-reply-to: <20030521163038.2792062E4D@mallaury.noc.nerim.net>
	(jmarant@nerim.net)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14128
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14128

    Anyway, would it be of any annoyance to add a
    'zap-up-to-char' function which does the same as zap-to-char
    except from removing the character?

I see no point in it, but I won't object if someone else adds it.
It could go in misc.el.