From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Custom question: different default values for different environments? Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:20:57 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <843ck4jdkw.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84znm98g7q.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84sms0s8gy.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051759392 32572 80.91.224.249 (1 May 2003 03:23:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 03:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu May 01 05:23:09 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19B4eL-0008Qb-00 for ; Thu, 01 May 2003 05:22:21 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19B4nn-0006qT-00 for ; Thu, 01 May 2003 05:32:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19B4f1-0005ZZ-03 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19B4da-0004oi-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19B4dE-0004Jy-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19B4cz-0003wF-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 19B4cz-0002Rv-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:20:57 -0400 Original-To: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-reply-to: <84sms0s8gy.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (kai.grossjohann@gmx.net) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13581 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13581 The new plan is to require the user to type "/rsh:user@host:bla" if rsh is to be invoked, and "/remsh:user@host:bla" if remsh is to be invoked. I won't argue against it.