From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: movemail on Debian
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:43:35 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E19AkNT-0008EE-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <rzqissx2xrl.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051681726 9839 80.91.224.249 (30 Apr 2003 05:48:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 05:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 30 07:48:45 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19AkST-0002YV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:48:45 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19AkbT-0002N3-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:58:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 19AkNy-0008RK-05
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:44:06 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 19AkNV-0008ON-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:43:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 19AkNU-0008NV-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:43:36 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 19AkNT-0008NH-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:43:35 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 19AkNT-0008EE-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:43:35 -0400
Original-To: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <rzqissx2xrl.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (message from Dave Love on 29
	Apr 2003 15:17:50 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13567
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13567

	    * configure.in: When we have -llockfile, define HAVE_LIBMAIL, not
	    LIBMAIL.

Can you explain the meaning of defining LIBMAIL, and the meaning of
defining HAVE_LIBMAIL, so I can understand this change?

Does HAVE_LIBMAIL have any existing meaning, distinct from its effect
on the conditional you are adding to gnu-linux.h?