From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.xemacs.design,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Rationale for split-string?
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:12:38 -0400
Sender: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org
Message-ID: <E198ptO-00039k-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87brz57at2.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	<200304171744.h3HHiJCx009215@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<E196jkF-0005dy-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87adem27ey.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	<E197Pes-0005NG-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87ist8yv4n.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	<E1988ct-0003m8-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <87vfx5vor0.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051225954 2232 80.91.224.249 (24 Apr 2003 23:12:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 23:12:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org
Original-X-From: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org Fri Apr 25 01:12:32 2003
Return-path: <xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org>
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org ([199.184.165.135])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 198ptI-0000Zr-00
	for <xemacs-design@gmane.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 01:12:32 +0200
Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.11.6p2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h3OND1M26335;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:13:01 -0400
Original-Received: (from turnbull@localhost)
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.11.6p2/8.9.1) id h3ONCuS26313
	for xemacs-design-mailman@xemacs.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:12:56 -0400
Original-Received: (from mail@localhost)
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.11.6p2/8.9.1) id h3ONCla26251
	for turnbull@tux.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:12:47 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by gwyn.tux.org (8.11.6p2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h3ONCcM26192;
	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:12:39 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 198ptO-00039k-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:12:38 -0400
Original-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
In-reply-to: <87vfx5vor0.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org)
X-XEmacs-List: design
Errors-To: xemacs-design-admin@xemacs.org
X-BeenThere: xemacs-design@xemacs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:xemacs-design-request@xemacs.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:xemacs-design@xemacs.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xemacs.org/lists/listinfo/xemacs-design>,
	<mailto:xemacs-design-request@xemacs.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of design and features for XEmacs. <xemacs-design.xemacs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xemacs.org/lists/listinfo/xemacs-design>,
	<mailto:xemacs-design-request@xemacs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.xemacs.design:2119 gmane.emacs.devel:13438
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13438

    Unless you say you prefer to do it yourself, I will also submit a
    patch against GNU Emacs CVS head, and audit the Lisp code in CVS head
    to make sure there are no surprises from callers with non-default
    SEPARATORS.

That would be very kind of you.  To use the same code can't hurt, and
may help.