From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eval-after-load as a macro (and eval-next-after-load) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:47:17 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200304042030.h34KUEQL008262@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200304062105.h36L55Jn019873@rum.cs.yale.edu> <84y92mslqe.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <84brziwhsi.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <5xhe99z2q8.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xllyjdxx5.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1050015074 6273 80.91.224.249 (10 Apr 2003 22:51:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 11 00:51:09 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 193ksv-0001cm-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:51:09 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 193ky6-00053P-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:56:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 193kpy-0001r6-03 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 193kpQ-0000zh-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 193kpE-0000hb-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 193kpB-0000Yj-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:47:17 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 193kpB-0005gp-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:47:17 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: <5xllyjdxx5.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13125 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13125 Perhaps not, but IMO there are two types of hooks -- those defined with defcustom [supposing they are for users to change] and other hooks [which are for Lisp code to change]. There is no such convention, and adopting it would be a big change.