From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: \225 and so on Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:22:27 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200304090240.LAA15563@etlken.m17n.org> <873ckskm8g.fsf@gnu.org> <200304091105.UAA16120@etlken.m17n.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049956363 10856 80.91.224.249 (10 Apr 2003 06:32:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 10 08:32:40 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 193Vc0-0002ov-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:32:40 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 193Vgq-00042R-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:37:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 193VUz-0004YZ-0A for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:25:25 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 193VU2-0004JM-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 193VSm-0003ly-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 193VS9-0003kX-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 193VS7-0003Ms-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:22:27 -0400 Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-reply-to: <200304091105.UAA16120@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:05:13 +0900 (JST)) Original-cc: schwab@suse.de Original-cc: alex@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13106 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13106 > In my .emacs, I use the following code. Does that mean we should add > \227 also? It's up to you. If you register the more bytes in latin-extra-code-table, the more cases Emacs detects files as latin-1, not as binary data. In general, only those bytes that frequently appear in wrongly labeled latin-1 files should be registered. Real binary files will probably have codes 0200-0217 and 0220-0227, so I don't think we have to worry. I think we should add 227 to this list.