unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug] Issues with format.el: coding system, byte/char confusi on
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 01:39:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1938Iu-0000HG-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67B8CED503F3D511BB9F0008C75DAD6605485571@dewdfx17> (christoph.wedler@sap.com)

     > That would be true, if there is anything in
     > after-insert-file-functions other than
     > after-insert-file-set-buffer-file-coding-system.  Normally I believe
     > there isn't anything else.

    What does this mean?  Is `after-insert-file-functions' obsolete without
    being declared as such?

It is not obsolete.  What I am saying is that normally the only
element of after-insert-file-functions is
after-insert-file-set-buffer-file-coding-system.

If you add other elements, you can choose where to put them.

     > Not necessarily.  That would depend on what those other functions are.
     > Normally there aren't any others.  I suppose if you add other functions
     > to this hook that you should put them in the proper order.

    As I said, the coding system is determined not only after some functions
    in this hook, but also after the format-decode functions.

I think I am totally lost now.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-09  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-08 18:01 [Bug] Issues with format.el: coding system, byte/char confusi on Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-09  5:37 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-04-09  5:39 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2003-04-15  2:06 ` Richard Stallman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-09 18:26 Wedler, Christoph
2003-04-10  6:23 ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-10 12:05   ` Kenichi Handa
2003-04-11  8:51     ` Richard Stallman
2003-04-11 11:04       ` Kenichi Handa
2003-05-02 14:11 Wedler, Christoph
2003-05-03 15:03 ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-13 17:18 Wedler, Christoph

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1938Iu-0000HG-00@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).