From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scrollbar (once more) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:24:01 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200304030235.h332Zsv12591@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200304040441.h344fvj13614@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049508353 1044 80.91.224.249 (5 Apr 2003 02:05:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 02:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 05 04:05:52 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191d44-0000Gi-00 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 04:05:52 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 191d6O-0008Cy-00 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 04:08:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 191d2v-00018O-06 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:04:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 191d2a-00015N-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 191d2Y-00011w-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:04:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.10.13) id 191d2X-0000zw-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 21:04:17 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 191ZbN-00062G-00; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 17:24:01 -0500 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200304040441.h344fvj13614@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:41:57 -0600 (CST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12907 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12907 I'd call it a bug. Could you try to figure out what causes it? Somehow, with the narrowed buffer completely out of view above the window and point just after the final newline, the computation of the thumb length seems to count the entire inaccessible portion after point as "present" in the window. That is what happens, but what we need to know is why. I don't know that code myself, and I am failing to keep up with my mail this week, so I hope someone can figure out the cause of the problem.