From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: BUG: which-func-mode
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:48:11 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18tNRj-0004rG-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <b43gv7$80s$1@main.gmane.org>
	<200303101828.h2AISIrs027316@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<200303111907.h2BJ7ZHv012258@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047542186 8632 80.91.224.249 (13 Mar 2003 07:56:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:56:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 08:56:22 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18tNZe-0002F3-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:56:22 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18tNxG-0002IT-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:20:46 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18tNXc-0007WP-06
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:54:17 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18tNSr-0005wP-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:49:21 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18tNSO-0005jQ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:48:54 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18tNRj-0004UT-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:48:11 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18tNRj-0004rG-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:48:11 -0500
Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
In-reply-to: <200303111907.h2BJ7ZHv012258@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	(monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu)
Original-cc: lewang@yahoo.com
Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:12329
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:12329

I see two choices: either document that select-window can change the
buffer list order and that save-selected-window does not protect
against that, or else change save-selected-window to save and restore
the buffer list order.  I think the former is better.

Any other ideas?  Does anyone want to write it?

Meanwhile, the patch to which-func-mode seems like the right approach
there.