From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Rmail mbox format branch
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:37:38 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18ks1C-0004dM-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200302151817.h1FIH6Sh004672@copa.pajato.com>
	<E18kfYj-0007VO-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200302170750.h1H7oPbU022472@copa.pajato.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045514510 2268 80.91.224.249 (17 Feb 2003 20:41:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 20:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ks4K-0000WV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:40:52 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ksIt-0005OX-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:55:55 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ks5U-000529-01
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:42:04 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ks1t-0003rZ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:38:21 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ks1d-0003jZ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:38:06 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18ks1C-0003SX-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:37:38 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18ks1C-0004dM-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:37:38 -0500
Original-To: pmr@pajato.com
In-reply-to: <200302170750.h1H7oPbU022472@copa.pajato.com> (message from Paul
	Michael Reilly on Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:50:25 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11717
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11717

    Sorry it took me so long to get the branch checked in.  FWIW, my
    immediate Rmail plans/preferences are to fix sorting, add the spam
    elimination package and work on Imap support using the suggested
    front-end, back-end design.

I think that unrmail is actually more important than all of those,
because people need that in order to try the new Rmail easily.