From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: info
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:11:19 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18f5r5-0004AL-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1030129161253.20453A-100000@is>
	<E18eGVJ-0004hc-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E18eghy-0000PR-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200302010122.TAA12524@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044137604 1755 80.91.224.249 (1 Feb 2003 22:13:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 22:13:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18f5t4-0000S2-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 23:13:22 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18f5zt-0001E8-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 23:20:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18f5sa-0005Hv-08
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:12:52 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18f5rU-0004p9-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:11:44 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18f5r8-00047e-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:11:26 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18f5r6-000412-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:11:20 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18f5r5-0004AL-00; Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:11:19 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200302010122.TAA12524@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc
	Teirlinck on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:22:45 -0600 (CST))
Original-cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il
Original-cc: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11278
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11278

    I see at least three solutions that would be better than the algorithm
    you propose:

Any of these three might be good.

Another idea is that any blank line ends the menu item.
That would do the right thing in the examples you showed me,
and it may well be that there are no blank lines in the middle
of single menu items.