From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al.
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:06:06 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18dfjy-0003ax-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <buo65sgp7w8.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<buod6mn84kr.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<E18cVtQ-0002g8-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200301260112.h0Q1CTr17923@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<E18cz3w-0001of-00@fencepost.gnu.org><20030127145204.GA14625@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043799083 26839 80.91.224.249 (29 Jan 2003 00:11:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18dfp1-0006yM-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:11:19 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18dftw-0007Q1-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:16:24 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18dfpT-0004nO-02
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:11:47 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18dflv-0003yR-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:08:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18dflZ-0003nQ-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:07:46 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18dfjy-0003X6-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:06:06 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18dfjy-0003ax-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:06:06 -0500
Original-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <20030127145204.GA14625@gnu.org> (message from Miles Bader on
	Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:52:04 -0500)
Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11174
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11174

    I did a grep for "{next,prev}{,-single}-property-change" (which I think is
    the set of functions effect), and there are over 200 occurances (most of
    which are actually the `-single' variants).  This seems enough that doing any
    kind of thorough check is a fair burden, and I really don't think it's worth
    the time.

I think you can check them all in an hour.  Why not?