From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 2, Issue 28
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:49:35 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18aQ87-0006ND-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E18ZDQC-0003mt-02@monty-python.gnu.org>
	<3405-Sat18Jan2003154003+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043024241 27119 80.91.224.249 (20 Jan 2003 00:57:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:57:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18aQFb-000739-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:57:19 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18aQQE-0006k9-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 02:08:18 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18aQEI-00068d-00
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:55:58 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18aQCW-0005VF-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:54:08 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18aQBr-0005IA-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:53:27 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18aQ87-00038e-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:49:35 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18aQ87-0006ND-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:49:35 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10881
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10881

    > Is this really the right way for it to work?
    > Should the choice of unibyte or multibyte string
    > be tied in this way to the choice of coding system?

    Maybe provide `set-process-multibyte' analogue to `set-buffer-multibyte'.

I think that is a good idea.