From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Make call-process (and start-process?) filename handlers? Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:28:51 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <84isxdpyg5.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <200301102352.h0ANqoK01404@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200301142242.QAA06832@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042673592 3158 80.91.224.249 (15 Jan 2003 23:33:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Yx1z-0000on-00 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:33:11 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18YxAe-0000Yc-00 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:42:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Yx2M-0001Uu-03 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:33:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Yx1v-0001J2-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Ywy5-0007ju-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Ywxn-0007cA-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:28:51 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18Ywxn-0001N5-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:28:51 -0500 Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-reply-to: <200301142242.QAA06832@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:42:57 -0600 (CST)) Original-cc: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de Original-cc: ehud@unix.mvs.co.il Original-cc: schwab@suse.de X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10767 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10767 No argument: local, output treated as usual. Prefix argument: local, output at point, just like now, except: 2 C-u's : remote, output as usual 3 C-u's: remote, output at point. I see nothing unacceptable about this. If people are happy with it, we could do it.