From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:05:21 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E18YlMH-0004WA-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87adpxob2n.fsf@alice.dynodns.net>
	<87bs5r1cyp.fsf@gnu.org>	<E18TFGY-0005lZ-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87hecud8ef.fsf@alice.dynodns.net><87u1gqpyss.fsf@alice.dynodns.net>
	<E18UYSt-0004wY-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E18YSEh-000GUP-00@gannet.scg.man.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042629039 23094 80.91.224.249 (15 Jan 2003 11:10:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:10:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: johnw@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18YlRM-00060K-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:10:36 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18YlZm-0001VB-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:19:18 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18YlQj-0005G5-0E
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:09:57 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18YlPA-0004HO-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:08:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18YlOx-0003zN-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:08:09 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18YlMH-0002J6-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:05:21 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18YlMH-0004WA-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:05:21 -0500
Original-To: p.lord@russet.org.uk
In-reply-to: <E18YSEh-000GUP-00@gannet.scg.man.ac.uk> (message from Phillip
	Lord on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:40:15 +0000)
Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10746
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10746

He's talking about the version in CVS.  I am hoping to find out what
changed in Emacs that caused wide-column.el not to work, so I cna fix it.